Jamie Lynn Spears shares big update about Zoey 102: release date, cast and more

In his nearly four-decade-long career, Patrick Dempsey has stuck to long-term, serious relationships unlike most of his peers

You need to set up both a router and a modem if you want Wi-Fi internet in your home, but there are major differences between the two devices.

From streetwear to elegant evening dresses, the catwalks of London Fashion Week were not short of choices as designers showcased their collections...

'To be a fat woman is one of the hardest things to do in this world,' said Claudia Oshry

Jamie Foxx was rushed to a hospital in Atlanta on April 11, where he was filming the action-comedy ‘Back In Action’ with Cameron Diaz

Ethan Hawke has admitted he embraced writing and directing movies over fears he would no longer be offered any acting roles

As IShowSpeed missed a penalty against KSI, fans went wild as both of them have an ongoing online feud

The former 'Fear Factor' host always shields his family from the media spotlight

Sarah Snook's portayal as Shiv Roy in 'Succession' gained her worldwide fame which she looks to capitalize on in her next project

xQc has built a reputation for failing to show up to events after making a commitment

Jeremy Clarkson’s article professing his “hatred” of Meghan Markle in The Sun was sexist, “pejorative and prejudicial” against the Duchess of Sussex, the press regulator has ruled. The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) said the newspaper broke press standards by running the article, in which Clarkson described how he hated her on a “cellular level”. Ipso ordered The Sun to publish a front-page statement explaining how Clarkson broke anti-discrimination rules, which also ran online. Sign up to our free Indy100 weekly newsletter However, some people were left dissatisfied with the ruling. Catherine Mayer, co-founder of the Women’s Equality Party, said: “It’s so obvious that Jeremy Clarkson's diatribe against Meghan was sexist that it’s odd Ipso had to investigate to reach that conclusion. She added: “The real issue is how such pieces are commissioned and signed off and why journalism is getting shriller and more abusive.” Domestic abuse campaigner David Challen wrote on Twitter: “The real headline should be @IpsoNews takes 7 months to come to glaringly obvious conclusion. Yet another nail in the coffin of our toothless press regulator.” And Lawrence Davies, chief executive of nonprofit Equal Justice, added: “We won on sexism. Can’t see why it wasn’t racist though.” Clarkson wrote that he disliked Meghan more than the serial killer Rose West and dreamed of the day “when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant ‘shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”. The Fawcett Society gender equality charity, which made the initial complaint to Ipso, said the ruling is a “landmark decision” about a “vile and offensive” column. The ruling is the first time a complaint to Ipso about discrimination relating to someone’s sex has been upheld, the regulator said. Clarkson’s article attracted more than 25,000 complaints when it was published in December, and was swiftly pulled from the internet. A spokesperson for The Sun said the company regretted publishing the column, pointing to high female readership at the newspaper, as well as its campaigns on domestic abuse and the cost of being a young mother. Ipso chairman Lord Faulks said the imagery used in the article was “humiliating and degrading” towards Meghan. Among the critics of the article at the time were Clarkson’s daughter, while the Duke of Sussex called it “horrific, hurtful and cruel”. Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.