YouTuber IShowSpeed was ignored by Lionel Messi's wife Antonella Roccuzzo when he asked her for a photo

The main suspect, Keefe D, also previously mentioned Diddy in relation to Tupac Shakur's death

Jeremy Clarkson’s article professing his “hatred” of Meghan Markle in The Sun was sexist, “pejorative and prejudicial” against the Duchess of Sussex, the press regulator has ruled. The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) said the newspaper broke press standards by running the article, in which Clarkson described how he hated her on a “cellular level”. Ipso ordered The Sun to publish a front-page statement explaining how Clarkson broke anti-discrimination rules, which also ran online. Sign up to our free Indy100 weekly newsletter However, some people were left dissatisfied with the ruling. Catherine Mayer, co-founder of the Women’s Equality Party, said: “It’s so obvious that Jeremy Clarkson's diatribe against Meghan was sexist that it’s odd Ipso had to investigate to reach that conclusion. She added: “The real issue is how such pieces are commissioned and signed off and why journalism is getting shriller and more abusive.” Domestic abuse campaigner David Challen wrote on Twitter: “The real headline should be @IpsoNews takes 7 months to come to glaringly obvious conclusion. Yet another nail in the coffin of our toothless press regulator.” And Lawrence Davies, chief executive of nonprofit Equal Justice, added: “We won on sexism. Can’t see why it wasn’t racist though.” Clarkson wrote that he disliked Meghan more than the serial killer Rose West and dreamed of the day “when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant ‘shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”. The Fawcett Society gender equality charity, which made the initial complaint to Ipso, said the ruling is a “landmark decision” about a “vile and offensive” column. The ruling is the first time a complaint to Ipso about discrimination relating to someone’s sex has been upheld, the regulator said. Clarkson’s article attracted more than 25,000 complaints when it was published in December, and was swiftly pulled from the internet. A spokesperson for The Sun said the company regretted publishing the column, pointing to high female readership at the newspaper, as well as its campaigns on domestic abuse and the cost of being a young mother. Ipso chairman Lord Faulks said the imagery used in the article was “humiliating and degrading” towards Meghan. Among the critics of the article at the time were Clarkson’s daughter, while the Duke of Sussex called it “horrific, hurtful and cruel”. Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.

Even though security claimed Travis Kelce wasn't at the cordoned-off home, children and parents thought otherwise as they saw lights in some rooms

Get your space suits on! Futurama is finally back, and it's as glorious as ever.

Kevin Costner's lawyers accused Christine Baumgartner of bringing 'a level of animosity to this proceeding that is wholly unnecessary'

Here's which couples from Netflix's dating show 'Perfect Match' made it to their happily ever after

Harry Styles allegedly told Roy Stride he'd like to reunite with him to make solo music after he co-wrote for One Direction.

Oakland Athletics broadcaster Glen Kuiper was let go by NBC Sports California after using a racial slur during a telecast while describing a trip to the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum

Sam Asghari, 29, and Britney Spears, 41, recently ended their 14-month marriage when he allegedly confronted her about adultery suspicions

In a recent court filing, Angelina Jolie’s attorneys have accused her ex Brad Pitt of wasting the 'company’s assets', which they said he used for 'vanity projects'

'Thank you to everyone who has sent messages and kept our family in your hearts during this terrible heartbreak,' wrote Ellie Williams